| |
|
|
|
|
To Participate or Not?
In March this year the government of Zimbabwe announced that they were
going
to hold the next scheduled parliamentary election in March 2005. They
said
they were giving the country a year in which to prepare itself for this
event. They also made the snide remark that they thought it would give
the
MDC time to get ready for the election.
Since it was formed the rationale of the MDC has been to fight
elections -
we have said from day one, that we believed in a democratic transition
that
was peaceful and lawful. We have strictly adhered to those principles
despite 4 years of extreme provocation.
However, when we came to consider what it would mean to go into another
election under present conditions, we paused for thought and eventually
came
out and said "unless the following 15 demands are met, we will not
contest
the election". Since then we have come under intense pressure from the
regional and international community to run again. We have not moved
our
position and continue to say that until our demands are met, we will
not
contest the election.
Hope rose when the SADC summit of regional leaders agreed to a clear
set of
principles by which they would manage the democratic process in their
countries. Mugabe signed and the region breathed a sigh of relief. We
watched, suspicious and cautious from the sidelines. What would that
wily
old devil, Mugabe do?
Well now we know - he has bulldozed through Parliament new legislation
that
will further weaken the democratic process and tighten his own grip on
the
administration of elections. He has made some token concessions in the
direction of free and fair elections but these steps have been totally
overwhelmed by the tightening of laws governing the electoral process,
the
role of civil society and the media. On the ground there is no
relaxation of
any of the other instruments of suppression that he holds. There is no
freedom of speech, no freedom of association; the legal system is still
being used every day to suppress opposition activity and to maintain
their
total grip on all civil activity.
The food weapon is in place and ready to be used, the message that "you
cannot do anything without us" is being spread across the country.
Business
is being told to stay in line or else. The slightest threat of public
protest or dissent is greeted with overwhelming force.
But just as serious is the total lack of regard for Parliament. Serious
questions asked by the opposition are treated with distain. Opposition
MP's
are threatened in public by Zanu PF Ministers and MP's who are quite
sure
they will face no recrimination. New legislation that is in conflict
with
the Constitution is simply rammed through Parliament and a compliant
Supreme
Court can be relied upon to back up the actions of the State. Even the
standing rules of Parliament are abused daily so that nothing stands in
the
way of the State.
The reality is that Mugabe has no intention of holding a free and fair
election in Zimbabwe any time in the near future. We are in effect
seeing
just another form of the classic African coup - carried out under the
very
noses of the region and the global community. The question is do we
dignify
the process by our continued participation?
The answer is clearly no! Not while this farce is being played out. We
do
not live in a democracy, we live under a dictatorship. We do not live
in a
free market economy; we live in a kleptocratic State. We do not have a
functioning Parliament - that is simply expensive camouflage for the
States
real activities and it is time we brought the masquerade to a close.
I know we have not yet made that decision but it is clear that few of
our 15
key demands are going to be fulfilled. It is also simply too late to
even
contemplate an election in March 2005 when certain of these fundamental
reforms have not been put in place. So if Mugabe sticks to his guns on
the
issue of timing and Mbeki on his stance of non-intervention in the
affairs
of another African State (unless it is in West Africa or the Great
Lakes
region or at war with itself using military arms), then I simply cannot
see
the MDC contesting next year's election.
What does that mean? We have already been joined in our stance by two
minority Parties who have also said they will stay out of the process.
The
UN has not been asked to help with the election because that would open
up
the process and it is already too late for UN intervention. Will Zanu
simply
declare itself the winner of all 120 seats - Mugabe then appoint
another 30
seats and then declare that Zanu is re-elected for another 5-year term?
Such an outcome would be a disaster for everyone. It would close the
door to
any sort of democratic process of change, cast a pall across the whole
of
Southern Africa, keep all forms of international and multilateral aid
shut
down and give NEPAD a crushing blow. Zimbabweans would continue to flee
the
country as economic and political refugees and living standards and
life
expectancy would continue to shrink.
We all know this - and yet we search in vain the international press
for any
sign, that we are even a discussion point. So far I have seen no sign
that
the global community is concerned or has any sense of urgency about the
crisis in Zimbabwe. If we got hold of a few AK 47's and shot a few
people
that would change overnight. So long as we do not prepared to start
shooting - we are a problem that can be ignored. The fact that 5
million
people have died or fled the country is not an issue. That life
expectancy
has crashed from 59 years in 1990 to 35 years today. That half our
population is hungry and malnourished. That our hospitals are
mortuaries and
our schools, day care centers simply does not matter.
South Africa continues to stand on the sidelines, Pagad, the deputy
Minister
of Foreign Affairs says "show me the bodies and we will act", his boss,
Zuma, says they are "not taking sides." OK - if that is how you want to
play
the game, so be it, we hope they can live with the consequences.
Eddie Cross
Bulawayo, 17th November 2004.
|
|