| |
|
|
|
|
Where did we go wrong?
I am someone who was involved in the whole process of transition from
Rhodesia to Zimbabwe and I am now deeply embroiled in the subsequent
transition from tyranny to democracy in the new Zimbabwe. In the intervening
period covering some 50 odd years, a great deal has gone under the bridge
and a lot has gone wrong. A friend from the early days in Zimbabwe wrote to
me the other day and asked, 'Where did we go wrong?' I thought that question
needed an answer.
Obviously the historical background was the failure by the successive
governments after 1923, to recognise that their tenure was limited and that
without broad based democratic support, their grip on power was eventually
doomed to fail. Had they grasped that reality early on and started to work
on the future based on that assumption, the outcome would have been very
different.
As Nelson Mandela said in his autobiography, it was the whites that decided
how power was to be transferred. In failing to recognise the basic
realities, we created the conditions for the armed struggle and in doing so
we created the coterie of leaders who would eventually take over power and
rule in their stead. In our case, we were 'saved' from the worst effects of
this shortsightedness and stubbornness by international intervention but as
always, those responsible for managing events during that era were unable to
totally overcome the effect of our own political behavior in the previous
decades.
At Lancaster House we made further mistakes, imposing on Zimbabwe a British
style of constitution and failing to consult the majority. We found
ourselves in the aftermath, with a government led by people with no
experience of government, few entrenched principles and no commitment to
democratic values or basic human rights. They did not like the
constitutional dispensation forced on them by the international community
and the region but had no choice in the matter.
We compounded these mistakes by ignoring and condoning the subsequent abuses
of democratic principles and human rights when the new government was
obviously violating these. When Mugabe committed genocide from 1983 to 1987
under the guise of 'Gukurahundi', the rest of the world looked the other way
and continued to receive him as a respected leader in western capitals. When
he violated democratic principles and crushed domestic opposition, there was
no outcry or even support for civil society or the fledgling opposition. One
by one, successive opposition groups were allowed to suffocate and die.
Growing corruption, nepotism and flagrant violations of all the norms of
good governance simply went uncontested, embolden by this and seeing only
disinterest and unconcern, the Mugabe regime went on a spree, abandoning
fiscal prudence and restructuring the constitution to entrench their hold on
power. The steady erosion of the legal system and the principle of equality
before the law and the independence of the Judiciary followed these
developments and still the criticism from international organisations and
States and African countries remained muted.
Then, when finally the people of Zimbabwe decided that they had had enough,
the MDC came into being and delivered the first democratic defeat on Zanu PF
since 1980. Infuriated by this defeat, the leadership of the Zanu PF and the
security branches of the regime unleashed a well organised and funded 'total
onslaught' against the democratic forces that had combined to make the MDC
defeat of the regime possible.
They carefully analysed the electoral defeat and found that they had lost
the urban areas, won in the rural peasant districts and that the majority of
the 350 000 workers on commercial farms and estates together with their
families had also voted MDC. This 'swing vote' became the key objective.
Over the next five years, the regime simply smashed the entire agricultural
industry in a brutal effort to crush the opposition forces located on
commercial farms.
This marked the next mistake we all made. We failed to see what they were
doing and to understand why. Even the farmers did not fully grasp the
reality and right to the bitter end the CFU and the ZTA argued for the farm
community to be 'apolitical' and to 'co-operate with government' even while
they were being targeted politically and their assets stolen and the
industry they had built up at such great cost over the previous 100 years,
was being systematically destroyed. The international community also made
the mistake of accepting that this was 'land reform' when in fact that
slogan was just a smoke screen for their real intentions. African States,
including South Africa, made the mistake of taking Mugabe’s claims about the
'African credentials' of the MDC and the right of the State to plunder the
assets of the white farmers under the guise of 'land reform', at face value.
Even though 95 per cent of the farmers affected by the 'fast track land
reform programme' were Africans in all respects except the pigment of their
skins, they were treated as second-class citizens and foreigners. Even
though the race issue had dominated the struggle for freedom and democracy
in southern Africa for most of the previous century, this outrageous,
racially based criminal act went uncommented on in African dialogue. The
abuses were simply brushed aside by most as being justified as correcting an
historical wrong. This view persisted even when it became known that over 80
per cent of the targeted population had acquired their farms after
Zimbabwean independence in 1980.
This failure to call a spade a spade and the inevitable subsequent collapse
of the Zimbabwean economy led to the present situation where our GDP has
shrunk to 15 per cent of tiny Botswana and the great majority of Zimbabweans
are displaced and desperately poor. We have become the quintessential
example of how not to do things in the 21st Century; a model that will be
used in Universities and Colleges throughout the world to teach what happens
when you do dumb things.
But the list of our failures does not stop there. After a bitter and
protracted campaign for freedom and justice, the people of Zimbabwe finally
saw their votes overcome tyranny in 2008, a victory made even more
remarkable by the fact that this was achieved without a stone being thrown
or a shot fired. Instead of greeting this victory with the relief and
celebration that was due, the region, led by South Africa, allowed this
corrupt and brutal regime to hang onto power and forced the MDC into an
unholy alliance with their defeated oppressors that is expected to bring
forth a new democratic dispensation in 18 months. It’s a tall order.
Eddie Cross
Bulawayo, 11th July 2009
|
|